Print Page  Close Window


SEC Filings

10-Q
OREXIGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC. filed this Form 10-Q on 05/12/2017
Entire Document
 

 

and described above. The lawsuit claims infringement of the seven patents that were the subject of Actavis’ notice letter, as described above. In accordance with the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, known as the Hatch-Waxman Act, as a result of having filed a patent infringement lawsuit within 45 days of receipt of Actavis’ notice letter, FDA approval of the ANDA will be stayed until the earlier of (i) 30 months from the date of receipt of the notice letter or (ii) a District Court decision finding that the identified patents are invalid, unenforceable or not infringed. In July 2015, Actavis filed an answer, affirmative defenses and counterclaim to the Company’s and Takeda’s complaint, and the Company and Takeda filed an answer to Actavis’ counterclaim in August 2015. Moreover, in July 2015, the court ordered a stipulation between the Company, Takeda and Actavis in which Orexigen and Takeda agreed to dismiss all defendants except Actavis without prejudice, and Actavis agreed that the related Actavis entities will be bound to judgments and orders of the court against Actavis and will be subject to discovery as if they were parties. In September 2015, the court entered a scheduling order, setting a claim construction hearing for May 2016 and a three-day bench trial to begin in June 2017. After reviewing Actavis’ ANDA, the Company and Takeda subsequently dropped U.S. Patent Nos. 8,088,786, 8,318,788, 8,722,085 and 8,916,195 from the lawsuit. In April 2016, the Company and Takeda filed an amended complaint against Actavis asserting newly issued U.S. Patent No. 9,125,868. In June 2016, in response to the May 2016 claim construction hearing, the court adopted the Company’s proposed constructions for the majority of the disputed claim terms. In August 2016, in connection with the end of the transition period associated with the separation agreement entered into between the Company and Takeda, Takeda transferred responsibility for management of this patent infringement lawsuit to the Company. Although the Company plans to vigorously enforce Contrave intellectual property rights, there are uncertainties inherent in any litigation and we cannot predict the outcome.

35