Print Page  Close Window


SEC Filings

S-1/A
OREXIGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC. filed this Form S-1/A on 04/09/2007
Entire Document
 
Table of Contents

Our product candidates are combinations of generically-available pharmaceutical products, and our success is dependent on our ability to prevent off-label generic substitution of our combination products through our patent estate and laws that may prevent substituting drug products that are not therapeutically equivalent to our own.
 
The patents we have in-licensed and our pending patent applications may not prevent physicians from prescribing the generic constituents of our product candidates. We believe that a practitioner seeking safe and effective therapy is not likely to prescribe off-label generics in place of Contrave or Empatic because the dosage strengths, pharmacokinetic profiles and titration regimens recommended for our Contrave and Empatic product candidates are not available using existing generic preparations of naltrexone IR, zonisamide IR and bupropion SR. However, a physician could seek to prescribe off-label generics in place of Contrave or Empatic. Off-label use occurs when a drug that is approved by the FDA for one indication is prescribed by physicians for a different, unapproved indication.
 
With regard to off-label substitution at the pharmacy level, we expect to rely on the novel dose ratios and novel pharmacokinetic properties of our product candidates, as well as the differences in their approved indications, to provide sufficient distinction such that generic preparations are not considered therapeutic equivalents by the FDA. State pharmacy laws in many instances preclude pharmacists from substituting with generic preparations if the products are not therapeutic equivalents. Therefore, the lack of therapeutic equivalency restricts generic substitution by pharmacies and/or pharmacy benefit managers. However, we cannot be certain that pharmacists and/or pharmacy benefit managers will not substitute generics in place of Contrave and Empatic, which could significantly diminish their market potential.
 
In addition, although we believe the current market prices for the generic forms of naltrexone and zonisamide make generic substitution by physicians, pharmacists or pharmacy benefit managers unlikely, should the prices of the generic forms decline, the motivation for generic substitution may become stronger. Generic substitution by physicians and at the pharmacy level could have substantial negative consequences to our business.
 
We rely on third parties to conduct our clinical trials. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or meet expected deadlines, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize our product candidates within our expected timeframes or at all.
 
We currently rely primarily on Metropolitan Research Associates, or MRA, a CRO, to conduct our clinical trials for Contrave and Empatic, and we may depend on other CROs and independent clinical investigators to conduct our clinical trials in the future. We utilize the services of HHI Clinical & Statistical Services to conduct our data management. The third parties with which we contract for execution of our clinical trials play a significant role in the conduct of these trials and the subsequent collection and analysis of data. CROs and investigators are not our employees, and we have limited ability to control the amount or timing of resources that they devote to our programs. If MRA, other CROs, consultants or independent investigators fail to devote sufficient time and resources to our drug development programs, or if their performance is substandard, it will delay the potential approval of our regulatory applications and the commercialization of our product candidates. In addition, the execution of clinical trials, and the subsequent compilation and analysis of the data produced, requires coordination among various parties. In order for these functions to be carried out effectively and efficiently, it is imperative that these parties communicate and coordinate with one another. Moreover, these independent investigators and CROs may also have relationships with other commercial entities, some of which may compete with us. If independent investigators and CROs assist our competitors, it could harm our competitive position.
 
We expect intense competition in the obesity marketplace for Contrave and Empatic, and new products may emerge that provide different or better therapeutic alternatives for obesity and weight loss.
 
If approved and commercialized, both Contrave and Empatic will compete with well established prescription drugs for the treatment of obesity, including Xenical (orlistat), marketed by Roche Laboratories Inc., and Meridia (sibutramine), marketed by Abbott Laboratories. Orlistat has also been launched by


13